A Stand Against Wikipedia

By saying that "it is not itself an appropriate source of citation,", the chair of history department at Middlebury College implied there would be a peril when a student cite Wikipedia for their paper. I think this is a really good advice to every other college students. However, despite the inaccuracy on a lot of its entries, I believe Wikipedia still has helped college student have a good judgment about what sources they use for their papers.

Although Wikipedia has good as well as bad sources of information, among every sources over the Internet, it has the most organizing format, informative content, and excellent writings. I feel it brings me more certainty about what I try to find for my topic when I compare the information in other sources with it. Therefore, it is sometimes a measure of 'what is right or wrong' for me.

However, I would never consider and use Wikipedia as a great source for my citation. My reason is that the content in Wikipedia entries is too general. It makes me feel like writing Wikipedia entries is just gather different sources into one. On the other hand, other sources, over the Internet, include more detailed and trustworthy information, that I believe the author spend time doing a lot of research on it.

For others policies on Wikipedia, I totally agree with them. Internet is truly a much more complex environment, so it is very hard to find reliable materials. Also, it is a very good idea to consider that judging the source could help students develop their critical thinking skills.

I think faculty could allocate a group of students (or assistants) to check the reliability of the sources to make sure if they are proper to be put on papers!

Comparisons between the movie and the book

Personally, I think the movie did a better job than the book on presenting who Chris McCandless was. I love his smiley faces when he wandered a lot of places. I love how he shouted to express his freedom when he got to the 'magic' bus or his calm expression when stepping into Alaska bush. I strongly agree that cinema plays an important role describing the characters, also in this case, showing the reality and drawing the romantic tragedy.

Apparently, the book did well in providing readers with a lot of details. However, it repeats over and over the same thing and unnecessary information that makes me feel the story becomes less romantic and imaginable. It talks too much about his family, people who met him, and what others thought about, not digging into the main character.

Chris was clearly shown in the movie even if there is of course less information in there than the book. In the movie, I believe the cameraman did really excellently in picturing the romantic but scary scenes of nature. Chris was so excited and happy to be out there, while we can see he was really alone during that time. The perception of reality in it was much better!

Bravery

My perceptions of Chris McCandless actually have not changed since I started and finished this book. I recalled the first pages when I thought he was still an idealistic, enthusiastic young man, whom I believe deserved to have such freedom like that. However, there are somehow a few changes in my thoughts about Chris I have noticed throughout the story.

First, I understand more why Chris wanted to abandon his future, society, and especially his family to be reborn and live to the fullest. I saw his disgust to his parents who created an unhappy life for their child, Chris. They should have prepared him for the path, not the path for him. The path made Chris live in the life he does not want to live despite the fact he's a very talented kid.

Second, I understand how Chris got influenced from Jack London and Thoreau to fell in love with the nature. It is amazing to survive in such a long time out there like Chris did. He is not foolish but very brave and praiseworthy. Unfortunately, Chris was just a little unprepared and unlucky as well.

Despite his death, I think he was happy to finally achieve his goal and find his idea of living life. He won over the materialistic life and all the obligations.

Not an outcast at all

Brought up in chapter 8 to 9, alike stories about McCandless-type, "outcasts" show not only connections but also differences between them and McCandless. However, why this interruption appeared in the middle of the story? Like Rosellini, Waterman, and McCunn, Chris McCandless had a somewhat similar journey to the wilderness and a tragic ending.

At first it seems like they were all young idealistic but foolish men who risked their life out there to simply prove something. Nevetheless, the author mentioned these characters to show the reader how Chris McCandless differs from the rest. Reading through the chapters, I feft these guys all have the same love for the nature like Chris but they are not the situations like his. In fact Chris cut all of his connection to the society and only remained a little intimacy to friends along the way to Alaska. He came to Alaska not to prove something, instead he found this place where he can stay away from all the displeasures in his materialistic life before and tried to reinvent himself by enjoying the romance of nature. He is definitely not an outcast, instead he just tried to become who he wanted to be.

Everett Ruess is somebody like Chris. They had the same ideas and feelings. During the journey, while Chris changed his name to Alex Supertramp, Everett did his to Nemo. As I said, they tried to reinvent themselves, in there, they just used the new names to identify themselves.

Reflection on epigraphs

I think Leo Tolstoy and Wallace Stegner both come to me with the same wisdom of living life. I strongly agree with both that when you're out of all the burdens coming from daily life, history, law and any kinds of obligation you live your life as yourself. Being a footloose is not a problem; it just helps you release all the hidden energy from the ordinary boring life.

Chris is in that situation. It makes him happy when he has nothing to do with all the expectations from parents and society any more.